Find the articles, translations, decks and posts that need a correction—and the people who own them.
Source → claim → published asset. A worked example and a register for your GTM content team.
A&A proposal · Automate & Augment · 2026-11-01
Record claim IDs and source revisions so a changed source points to the assets that need review.
Source: A&A, GTM source library and reviewed article distribution bridge; checked 2026-11-01. Generated concept image.
A statement found in a source is different from a measured result. Unverified claims stay on hold.
| Label | What the record means | Editorial treatment |
|---|---|---|
| F: observed | A passage was checked | Attribute vendor statements; do not imply testing |
| O: opinion | An author's view or advice | Keep the author and applicability limits |
| H: proposal | A&A's design or fictional example | Label it as a proposal or an illustration |
| U: unverified | Original passage not checked | Hold it and assign a verifier |
Source: A&A, GTM source library, Retrieval and admission instructions; checked 2026-11-01. These labels are A&A's convention.
A team describes syncing in the fictional product Relay. C-A identifies the claim; S-A identifies its source.
| Record | Example entry | Boundary to retain |
|---|---|---|
| Source S-A / r1 | Relay specification, “Sync scope” | URL: example.com/relay/spec |
| Claim C-A / r1 | “Sync is available on business plans” | F: exclude personal plans |
| Verification | 2026-11-01 · content editor | Save the passage and its location |
| Limits | Specification wording checked | Operation and outcomes are untested |
Source: A&A proposal and fictional example, created 2026-11-01. Retain source excerpts only as permitted; do not assume full-text redistribution rights.
Attach the claim ID and exact input revision to every derived asset. Here, r1 names a fixed revision.
Keep each public URL with its text, image and PDF revision. Never reuse a revision ID for changed content.
Source: A&A proposal extending the reviewed article distribution bridge; checked 2026-11-01. All IDs are fictional.
Source meaning: “Relay sync is available on business plans; personal plans are excluded.” Compare each translation against that scope.
“Relay supports syncing.”
This could include personal plans. Reject the translation: it broadens C-A@r1.
“Relay supports syncing on business plans; personal plans are excluded.”
Keep C-A@r1 and EN-A@r1 in the translation record.
Source: A&A fictional comparison, 2026-11-01. English back-translations make the scope difference visible. An unchecked source claim cannot pass through translation review.
S-A@r2 limits syncing to premium business plans. List the affected assets before editing them.
Compare S-A r1 → r2. Narrow C-A r1 → r2 to the new plan condition. The editor checks the wording.
Flag EN-A → L-A and D-A → P-A for review. Give each owner the changed passage and affected revision.
C-B uses only source S-B. Record why it is outside this change, so it is not rewritten without a reason.
Source: A&A fictional example, 2026-11-01. Missing dependency records can still leave affected assets undiscovered.
A corrected draft does not prove that every distributed copy changed. Record verified, unverified or cannot edit for each destination.
Source: A&A proposal informed by the reviewed article distribution bridge's destination-verification design; checked 2026-11-01. This is not a claim about current operational results.
Close a correction against its reason, scope, owner and destination check. Schedule the next source review; bring it forward if a change is announced.
| Scope / reason | Owner / deadline | Verification / next review |
|---|---|---|
| S-A, C-A: new scope | Editor / 2026-11-02 | Passage checked / 2026-12-01 |
| EN-A, L-A: revised | Editor, localizer / 2026-11-02 | Record agreement at each URL |
| D-A: old PDF remains | Deck owner / 2026-11-03 | Open until public PDF is checked |
| P-A: old condition | Distribution / 2026-11-03 | Correction pending; keep open |
Source: A&A fictional correction log, 2026-11-01. These are example dates, not a recommended cadence. Set review intervals by volatility and impact.
Start with a published claim. Add a row for each claim × destination URL; recover missing links from search and production history.
| Record | Fields to capture | Your entry |
|---|---|---|
| Source | ID, URL, passage, revision, check date | __________________ |
| Claim | ID, wording, F/O/H/U, conditions | __________________ |
| Derived asset | ID, language, input revision, URL, owner | __________________ |
| Correction | Reason, due date, action, check, next review | __________________ |
Simulate a source change. Fill any gaps in affected URLs or owners before using the register.
Source: A&A proposal, 2026-11-01. Download the blank CSV register. Use one row per claim and destination.
Sources & editorial note: AI researched and drafted this deck; a separate AI reviewer and machine checks reviewed it. No human reviewed the content.
This is a proposed update workflow. It does not establish source truth, legal compliance or search visibility.
GTM source library: claim types and source mapping. Reviewed article distribution bridge: fixed assets and destination checks.
Relay, the dependency map, revision IDs and deadlines illustrate the workflow. They are not customer evidence or measured results.
Google: AI features and your website recommends text for important content. Meeting requirements does not guarantee indexing or serving.
Source: A&A design records and Google Search Central's English documentation; checked 2026-11-01. The workflow, tables and examples are A&A's proposal.
Bring the article and distribution owners together. Simulate a source change, trace the affected assets and fill any missing URLs or owners.
Read the original English HTML deck
https://www.automateaugment.com/en/decks/ai-gtm-content-evidence-flow
Related reading: Adapt claims for each format · Settle facts before drafting · Assign translation update owners
Explore A&A's AI-native GTM support or contact A&A.